It’s been a busy week at the FCC. In a decision which affects millions of cable subscribers, they ruled against exclusive deals between cable companies and apartment owners. They also held public hearings on media consolidation. Broadcasting and Cable’s John Eggerton explains the stakes.
- fcc media law
Tags:
Related
Supported by
-
A Week of Scandals, Catholic Whistleblowers, and More
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
Catholic Whistleblowers
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
The Mayor of Toronto Would Prefer Not to Discuss Whether He Smokes Crack
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 52
-
Qapla!
-
Brooke Gladstone + Cyndi Lauper
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
A Week of Scandals, Catholic Whistleblowers, and More
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
Catholic Whistleblowers
-
Qapla!
-
The Three-Headed Scandal Monster
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
The Mayor of Toronto Would Prefer Not to Discuss Whether He Smokes Crack
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
Happy Birthday
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
Web Only Audio Extra - TV Cord Cutters
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
AdBlock Plus: The Internet's Ad Gatekeeper?
-
A Source for Sources
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
The Mayor of Toronto Would Prefer Not to Discuss Whether He Smokes Crack
-
Catholic Whistleblowers


Comments [2]
After hearing your podcast I wrote the FCC:
The concentration of media ownership in an ever small (sic) number of corporate hands is contrary to the welfare of the people, the democratic ideals and institutions of our nation. It is a direct threat to the principles and practice of the first amendment to the Constitution.
Far too little has been done to uphold the welfare of the nation by this collection of and other recent collections of Commissioner (sic) of this body and it an insult to all that is sacred in that Constitution.
Some years ago, I was able to use the license renewal process and, by extension, simple access to the public file of a local television station to hold them accountable for inadequate and unfair coverage of community events and, in that case, the campaign of a small third party in a local election.
Since they were required to pay a staffer to assure the security of the file during my examination, even the brief period I used as an example of the damage I could do to their payroll proved adequate in getting them to cover an event they would have preferred to pretend hadn’t existed – a protest of S. African tennis pros who had failed to keep a promise to speak out against their country’s then-policy of Apartheid at the city’s tennis tournament.
According to my understanding of a recent Bill Moyer’s Journal assessment of the current situation, this tactic may well no longer be viable.
Shame on you.
Thank god. I have been stuck with one cable company for the past couple of years, Direcpath, and I want more services, more choices. Thank you FCC, now I can have it.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.