How often can America lose its innocence? Again and again, as we feign shock over events that shouldn’t, if history is a guide, be all that surprising. Johns Hopkins professor Richard Halpern parses the “innocence industry” through the paintings of one of its major manufacturers, Norman Rockwell.
Related
Supported by
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 52
-
Brooke Gladstone + Cyndi Lauper
-
A Source for Sources
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
AdBlock Plus: The Internet's Ad Gatekeeper?
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
A Source for Sources
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
Bloomberg Terminals, Spying, and Business Models
-
Meet Strongbox
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
Web Only Audio Extra - TV Cord Cutters
-
AdBlock Plus: The Internet's Ad Gatekeeper?
-
A Source for Sources
-
Web Only Audio Extra - Crowdsourcing FOIA Requests


Comments [5]
Is it true what Bob said in the beginning of this segment? Almost none of the mainstream media mentioned the approved-by-Congress torture? Wow, now that shocks me. How can anyone trust the mainstream media then?
Oh, come on, professor! This reminds me of the old story about the navy pilot, up for his periodic physical and going through the psychiatric testing. Being shown a Rohrschack ink blot and asked to say what he sees, the pilot says, “A guy and his gal ‘doing’ it in the darkened balcony of the movie house!” The psychiatrist flips the page, and another ink blot is displayed. “Hey, this fella and girl friend messing around in the back seat of their car!” And so it goes, page after page elicits a similar sexual response from every view. This prompts the psychiatrist to exclaim, “For gosh sakes! You have the dirtiest mind of any pilot I’ve examined in ten years!”
Somewhat afronted, the pilot says, “Why blame me? You’re showing me the dirty pictures!”
This was an interesting discussion. As I was listening to Prof. Halpern talking, I had to check my calendar to make sure it wasn't one of those NPR April fools jokes. I guess everyone has an opinion and their own interpretation as to what they see when they look at a picture, but come on! A girl looking into a mirror applying lipstick is one thing. Arguing that the doll is displayed in a sexual position in the same frame is a stretch. And had the good professor talked to the artist. I guess he was already expired.
Innonence? How about willful ignorance or willful naivete? That's more like it!
Thank you for airing “Not so innocent”.
Once again you managed to touch on a potentially explosive subject without trying to sensationalize it or being too judgmental.
Prof. Halpern’s medicine is sure to leave a bitter taste in many mouths, but hopefully it will help some of us who are afflicted by chronic optimism.
Perhaps some of the products supplied by the “innocence industry” are needed some of the times, but as a society, we will never get better if we keep ignoring our ills by looking through rose-colored glasses all of the times.
After re-listening to piece on line and reading link with the excerpt from the book, I can’t help thinking of Bob Garfield as a friendly, honest nurse preparing the listener for some needed surgery: “…this will hurt for a while, but afterwards you’ll feel a lot better…”
Thanks, Mr. Garfield, I guess now I’ll have to go out and buy the book. Ouch!
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.