A bill offering a federal shield law just might go to the House floor for a vote this week. Which means that U.S. journalists are closer than ever to having legal protection for their conversations with sources. New York Times reporter Adam Liptak explains.
Related
Supported by
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 52
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
A Source for Sources
-
Brooke Gladstone + Cyndi Lauper
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
- Department of Justice Warrant Names Journalist as a Possible Leak Co-Conspirator
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
A Source for Sources
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
Meet Strongbox
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
Bloomberg Terminals, Spying, and Business Models
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
Web Only Audio Extra - TV Cord Cutters
-
The State of Streaming Music
-
AdBlock Plus: The Internet's Ad Gatekeeper?
-
A Source for Sources


Comments [2]
Re: Parsing Privilege, October 12, 2007, the photo, of reporters protesting in support of Matthew Cooper and Judith Miller, you ran on your website brings up a question which was not asked in the interview. Does the proposed shield law differentiate between a reporter protecting a whistle-blower and a reporter protecting an administration source who is using the reporter to plant a story.
Maybe it is not possible to draft a law that makes such a distinction but it should not go unmentioned especially in an interview with a reporter from the New York Times. The Times, not just in the Plame debacle but in the lead up to war allowed itself to be used to whitewash administration lies planted by unnamed sources.
Source confidentiality can cut both ways, to expose corporate or government malfeasance or to abet it.
YOUR ACTION IS VERY SUPPORTIVE BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE ARE SUFFERING YOUR SITUATION
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.