-
(drumsnwhistles/flickr)
The political candidates are starting to agree that "green collar jobs" are key to our economic and environmental future but they don't agree on the definition of a green collar job. Environmental leader Phil Angelides and reporter Russ Juskalian parse out what the term has come to mean.
Related
Supported by
-
Phone Calls in the Age of the Text Message, A New Speech Law in Libya, and More
-
The U.S. 'Secret' War in Cambodia
-
Obama's Historic Statement, the False Statistic on "Boomerang" Kids, and More
-
More Misleading Unemployment Numbers Quoted By the Media
-
Revenge Porn's Latest Frontier
-
"Author" of 'Naked Came The Stranger' Dies
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
5 Ways To Spot a B.S. Political Headline in Under 10 Seconds
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
The Phony Statistic About College Graduates
-
Phone Calls in the Age of the Text Message, A New Speech Law in Libya, and More
-
Comcast's Big Change
-
Obama's Historic Statement, the False Statistic on "Boomerang" Kids, and More
-
The Future of the Phone
-
Germany Publishes "Mein Kampf"
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
When Freedom of the Press is Not a Priority
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
A New (Troubling) Speech Law in Libya
-
5 Ways To Spot a B.S. Political Headline in Under 10 Seconds
-
Why the Myth that Vaccines Cause Autism Survives
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
The U.S. 'Secret' War in Cambodia
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 8
-
"Author" of 'Naked Came The Stranger' Dies
-
Local Television Broadcasting in the West Bank
-
The AP (Temporarily) Holds a Big Story
-
5 Ways To Spot a B.S. Political Headline in Under 10 Seconds
-
Remembering Barney Rosset
-
Reaction to Obama's Support of Gay Marriage


Comments [4]
Any candidate who is selling short-term relief from high gas prices is the opposite of an environmentalist and is selling snake oil. The price and availability of oil is as out the hands of a President or Congress as it is laughable to imagine. Does no one remember the two oil embargos?
Abandoning such short-term thinking and seriously committing to the massive task of retooling our infrastructure and economy for a sustainable future will create a "green collar" boom, not bashing the oil companies for show while encouraging the thirst for their product.
Why didn't anyone do the due diligence to look at the board of the Apollo Group? Sure, there are some dedicated environmentalists, but it is a marriage of convenience. Phil Angelides, a developer, contributed to the sprawl that is, literally, choking the Sacramento valley. Green collar? More like brown.
Private sector incentives trump government regulation of the private sector every time. Having said this, I confess that when I heard this piece I thought for a moment I was listening to another NPR Program: Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me. The interview has more the tone of a parody.
Over the past 20 years, "pro-business" groups, supported by industries that pollute or degrade the environment, have successfully equated environmental protections as job-killers. Environmentalists have only recently been able to successfully reject this association. The talk of "green jobs" is an affirmative argument that protecting the environment will not put people out of work, but put them into a new line of work. (Hopefully, a more technologically advanced, better paying line of work.)
To me, "green jobs" does not necessarily refer to any particular category of job, but to any economic activity that will result from creating incentives for the economy to operate in a more environmentally friendly manner. When someone argues that a law capping carbon emissions will hurt power-plant employees and air conditioning manufactures, environmentalists can point to "green jobs" related to alternative energy or the design, manufacture, and installation of new, energy efficient air conditioners.
Debate over the creation or loss of a particular number of jobs (e.g., Barak Obama's 5 million green jobs) is often misplaced. Most economists believe that the overall employment rate is not impacted by environmental regulation, but that the incentives created by the government will influence the kind of jobs people hold and may impact the distribution of wealth or the rate of economic growth.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.