-
(Barack Obama/flickr)
For much of the world, the image of Barack Obama as the president-elect doesn't square with their notions about the United States. It's all resulting in a massive case of
cognitive dissonance says
Steven Kull, director of the Program on International Policy Attitudes.
Related
Supported by
-
Phone Calls in the Age of the Text Message, A New Speech Law in Libya, and More
-
The U.S. 'Secret' War in Cambodia
-
Obama's Historic Statement, the False Statistic on "Boomerang" Kids, and More
-
More Misleading Unemployment Numbers Quoted By the Media
-
Revenge Porn's Latest Frontier
-
"Author" of 'Naked Came The Stranger' Dies
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
5 Ways To Spot a B.S. Political Headline in Under 10 Seconds
-
The Phony Statistic About College Graduates
-
Phone Calls in the Age of the Text Message, A New Speech Law in Libya, and More
-
Comcast's Big Change
-
Obama's Historic Statement, the False Statistic on "Boomerang" Kids, and More
-
The Future of the Phone
-
Germany Publishes "Mein Kampf"
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
When Freedom of the Press is Not a Priority
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
A New (Troubling) Speech Law in Libya
-
5 Ways To Spot a B.S. Political Headline in Under 10 Seconds
-
Why the Myth that Vaccines Cause Autism Survives
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
The U.S. 'Secret' War in Cambodia
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 8
-
"Author" of 'Naked Came The Stranger' Dies
-
Local Television Broadcasting in the West Bank
-
The AP (Temporarily) Holds a Big Story
-
5 Ways To Spot a B.S. Political Headline in Under 10 Seconds
-
Remembering Barney Rosset
-
Reaction to Obama's Support of Gay Marriage


Comments [1]
Of course there will be cognitive dissonance when Steven Kull does polling designed to promote the perception among academics around the world that the US is coercive toward the world.
As of January 20th that "party line" as it were will no longer be helpful to President Obama.
The Program on International Policy Attitudes has made its name attacking the popular notion of American Exceptionalism. Steven Kull should be intellectually honest and continue his attack despite his ideological preference. Spinning the work of PIPA now that Obama has been elected does an enormous journalistic and academic disservice to journalists that use his polling and academics that cite his papers.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.