You can take the politician out of Washington, but you can’t take Washington out of the politician. It’s the hottest rhetorical device of campaign ’08 says Slate assistant editor Juliet Lapidos. And it’s called antimetabole.
Apple
Artist: Califone
Music Playlist
- elections
Tags:
Related
Supported by
-
From the Archive: PSYCHIC TIPS, MEDIA FRENZIES AND TEXAS
-
The Edward Snowden Narrative, Privacy vs. Convenience, and More
-
'Is Anybody Down' is Gone - For Now
-
The Fox News Mole
-
Happy Birthday
-
Is Snowden a Hero, Traitor, or Something Else
-
Thanks For Everything, Bing
-
Our Privacy Delusions
- Where do you stand on government surveillance?
-
My Voice is My Passport
-
The Edward Snowden Narrative, Privacy vs. Convenience, and More
-
The Fox News Mole
-
Is Snowden a Hero, Traitor, or Something Else
-
Our Privacy Delusions
-
Thanks For Everything, Bing
-
Surveillance Revelations, Turkish Media Looks Away, and More
-
The Ever Changing Story of the PRISM Program
-
Snowden's Life Online
-
Happy Birthday
-
The State of Our Surveillance State


Comments [8]
The transcript on this is wrong - it says Gladstone says things that, actually, Lapidos said (the part critiquing Clinton's use of antimetabole)
I'm sure I wasn't the only person who immediately thought of Mystery Men during this story, with The Sphinx having such great lines as "To learn my teachings, I must first teach you how to learn" and "He who questions training only trains himself at asking questions."
My favorite: "When you can balance a tack hammer on your head, you will head off your foes with a balanced attack."
The relevance of your comment is a comment on your relevance.
Thanks for the link to "Silva Rhetoricae: The Forest of Rhetoric." It looks to be a very interesting resource.
We're having a bit of fun with this on my blog:
http://matthewfreeman.blogspot.com
According to the third paragraph of the Slate article linked to in the story synopsis above, chiasmus and antimetabole are not the same thing.
Chiasmus sounds better. Remember when Ben Stiller discussed this cheap rhetorical device in Mystery Men? (great movie moment)
Antimetabole? What a horrible word. I prefer chiasmus.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.