Should reporters lie or misrepresent themselves in order to get an important story? Undercover reporting has long been an effective, exciting and, some would argue, necessary journalistic tool. But at a time when the public's trust in the press is waning, can journalists afford to lie? In a piece that originally aired last fall, Brooke talks with undercover reporters and their critics.
Related
Supported by
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 52
-
Brooke Gladstone + Cyndi Lauper
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
A Source for Sources
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
AdBlock Plus: The Internet's Ad Gatekeeper?
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
A Source for Sources
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
Bloomberg Terminals, Spying, and Business Models
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
Meet Strongbox
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
Web Only Audio Extra - TV Cord Cutters
-
AdBlock Plus: The Internet's Ad Gatekeeper?
-
A Source for Sources
-
Web Only Audio Extra - Crowdsourcing FOIA Requests


Comments [3]
Jayson Blair hardly represents the field of undercover journalism or even, I hope, journalism in general. Unfortunately, his foremost link will always be that he manufactured and plagiarized his stories.
I found the subject matter interesting, but was disappointed that the case of the food critic was not addressed. Food critics go to restaurants as patrons without revealing they are "journalists". If they did reveal who they were they would be unable to give a reasonable assessment. I would be interested in whether the purists interviewed would see an issue in this case.
I found the subject matter interesting, but was disappointed that the case of the food critic was not addressed. Food critics go to restaurants as patrons without revealing they are "journalists". If they did reveal who they were they would be unable to give a reasonable assessment. I would be interested in whether the purists interviewed would see an issue in this case. http://www.onthemedia.org/episodes/2009/08/28/segments/139657
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.