It's no secret that politicians try to shape our understanding of major issues by controlling the words we use to debate them. Exhibit A: the Obama Administration's recent attempts to retool the way we talk about environmental policy. Green is out, clean is in. And don't mention "global warming." Chicago Tribune reporter Jim Tankersley explains.
-
From the Archive: PSYCHIC TIPS, MEDIA FRENZIES AND TEXAS
-
The Edward Snowden Narrative, Privacy vs. Convenience, and More
-
'Is Anybody Down' is Gone - For Now
-
The Fox News Mole
-
Happy Birthday
-
Is Snowden a Hero, Traitor, or Something Else
-
Thanks For Everything, Bing
-
Our Privacy Delusions
- Where do you stand on government surveillance?
-
Surveillance Revelations, Turkish Media Looks Away, and More
Comments [2]
I liked most of this segment, but felt that something had been missed. A dear friend of mine works in the brand new green economy, and he says that "Global Climate Change" is a much more accurate descriptor than "Global Warming". If things really do get as bad as the worst predictions, the gulf stream stops and Europe plunges to the same temperatures as Siberia, hardly "Global Warming" if you ask me.
Being the House Organ for a so called "scientific consensus" is still being a house organ even if nobody can buy shares in said so-called "scientific consensus".
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.