The Nazi revenge thriller "Iron Cross" has received little notice and critics who have seen the film haven't been too kind. The Hollywood trade publication Variety initially slammed the film but removed its negative review following a major ad buy by the filmmakers. Was it a quid pro quo? Gawker's John Cook explains.
- movies
Tags:
Related
Supported by
-
Phone Calls in the Age of the Text Message, A New Speech Law in Libya, and More
-
The U.S. 'Secret' War in Cambodia
-
More Misleading Unemployment Numbers Quoted By the Media
-
Obama's Historic Statement, the False Statistic on "Boomerang" Kids, and More
-
"Author" of 'Naked Came The Stranger' Dies
-
Revenge Porn's Latest Frontier
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 9
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
When Freedom of the Press is Not a Priority
-
Phone Calls in the Age of the Text Message, A New Speech Law in Libya, and More
-
Comcast's Big Change
-
When Freedom of the Press is Not a Priority
-
The Future of the Phone
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
Obama's Historic Statement, the False Statistic on "Boomerang" Kids, and More
-
Germany Publishes "Mein Kampf"
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
A New (Troubling) Speech Law in Libya
-
5 Ways To Spot a B.S. Political Headline in Under 10 Seconds
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
The U.S. 'Secret' War in Cambodia
-
Comcast's Big Change
-
"Author" of 'Naked Came The Stranger' Dies
-
After Graceland
-
Why the Myth that Vaccines Cause Autism Survives
-
The Future of the Phone
-
When Freedom of the Press is Not a Priority
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
Germany Publishes "Mein Kampf"


Comments [1]
I have no objection to adverting sales people selling into content. For example, if a medium is planning to run a piece on golf, then approach golf courses, equipment manufacturer, retailers, etc., about adverting in that issue or during that episode. Also, I think it is smart marketing to copy your advertising sales rep with any press release you are sending to a particular medium. (I don’t mind another voice bringing a good story to an editor’s attention one more time.) What I do fervently object to is the creation of seemingly editorial content strictly for its sales value as well as tolerance of the unfettered quid pro quo where advertisers get positive and pronounced editorial coverage despite the quality of the product or service in question. Running editorial and advertising as one unit where advertisers are “partners” is ethically dubious and it destroys the credibility of real PR in that medium, and perhaps across all media. The wall between editorial and advertising has always had a degree of fluidity, but I fear it is now no more than a gauzy veil. Editors, producers, journalists-rebuild this wall!
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.