-
(Horia Varlan)
For the past year, newspapers have been teaming up with a law firm called Righthaven to file lawsuits against people posting copyrighted content on the web, in what appears to be a stab at a lucrative new business model. However, Joe Mullin of Paidcontent.org says that over the past month, Righthaven has seen a string of losses that throw the future of this model into doubt.
Related
Supported by
-
Phone Calls in the Age of the Text Message, A New Speech Law in Libya, and More
-
The U.S. 'Secret' War in Cambodia
-
Revenge Porn's Latest Frontier
-
More Misleading Unemployment Numbers Quoted By the Media
-
"Author" of 'Naked Came The Stranger' Dies
-
Obama's Historic Statement, the False Statistic on "Boomerang" Kids, and More
-
Hitler's Copyright Fight
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
When Freedom of the Press is Not a Priority
-
Phone Calls in the Age of the Text Message, A New Speech Law in Libya, and More
-
Comcast's Big Change
-
When Freedom of the Press is Not a Priority
-
The Future of the Phone
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
Obama's Historic Statement, the False Statistic on "Boomerang" Kids, and More
-
Germany Publishes "Mein Kampf"
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
A New (Troubling) Speech Law in Libya
-
5 Ways To Spot a B.S. Political Headline in Under 10 Seconds
-
What's the Harm in Hate Speech?
-
The U.S. 'Secret' War in Cambodia
-
Comcast's Big Change
-
Germany Publishes "Mein Kampf"
-
After Graceland
-
Why the Myth that Vaccines Cause Autism Survives
-
The Future of the Phone
-
When Freedom of the Press is Not a Priority
-
Reporting on Taboo Topics in Liberia
-
I did a FOIA on myself, and all I got were these lousy letters


Comments [2]
After years of award-winning investigative journalism I was fired because I exposed the fraud of my editor in plagiarizing the works of others. Since plagiarism is the unauthorized use of the writings of another author as one's own original work, I would think newsapers have a strong interest in guarding their work and prosecuting those who steal.
As a lawyer, I have to ask: What happened to the common law concepts of champerty and maintenance, which make the activities of Righthaven unethical, if not tortious and criminal? This was, I hope, a part of the judge's reasoning in striking down Righthaven's "arrangement" with the newspapers, and would lead to the imposition of costs and ethical discipline against the offending parties.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.