This week Congress re-authorized the Patriot Act with the full-throated support of the Obama Administration. Bob talks with Washingtonian Magazine reporter Shane Harris about the Act's most controversial provisions.
Related
Supported by
-
A Week of Scandals, Catholic Whistleblowers, and More
-
The Mayor of Toronto Would Prefer Not to Discuss Whether He Smokes Crack
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
Catholic Whistleblowers
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 52
-
Qapla!
-
Brooke Gladstone + Cyndi Lauper
-
The Three-Headed Scandal Monster
-
A Week of Scandals, Catholic Whistleblowers, and More
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
Qapla!
-
Catholic Whistleblowers
-
The Three-Headed Scandal Monster
-
The Mayor of Toronto Would Prefer Not to Discuss Whether He Smokes Crack
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
Why The Tornado News Didn't Derail Scandal Coverage This Week
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
The Mayor of Toronto Would Prefer Not to Discuss Whether He Smokes Crack
-
Twitter Coverage Through The Night
-
AdBlock Plus: The Internet's Ad Gatekeeper?
-
Qapla!
-
Catholic Whistleblowers
-
OTM Staff Picks, Volume 52
-
Web Only Audio Extra - TV Cord Cutters


Comments [2]
According to the About page on this website, one aspect of On the Media's mission is to "examine threats to the freedom of information and expression in America and abroad." You're welcome to question the bias of this piece, Craig, but the privacy implications of the Patriot Act are on-topic for On the Media.
I am generally a fan of On the Media as an unbiased source of reporting about the media.
The story on the Patriot Act, however, was neither unbiased nor about the media.
It was instead a wholly biased look at a story that had nothing to do with the media. It did not recount the media’s coverage of the renewal of the patriot act in anyway.
Bob Garfield clearly made his position about the patriot act known, and it was the same as that of the guest. This in no way informed me or provided any insight into the topic at hand. If I wanted to hear biased reporting of opinion with no view of both sides I would listen to fox news.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.