We run into them all the time, and usually we skip over them -- monetized links. They're the double-underlined hyperlinks you see on some websites which link to paid advertising content. But could these tiny links actually incentivize writers to skew their content for money? It may already be happening. Bob investigates.
Shabazz Palaces - Endeavors for Never
Related
Supported by
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
A Source for Sources
-
Web Only Audio Extra - TV Cord Cutters
-
Angelina Jolie's Secret Test Results
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
Brooke Gladstone + Cyndi Lauper
-
Conservative Bloggers Vindicated, Advice for Leakers, and More
-
Who’s gonna pay for this stuff?
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
A Source for Sources
-
Bloomberg Terminals, Spying, and Business Models
-
Meet Strongbox
-
With IRS Scandal, Conservative Bloggers Feel Vindicated
-
An 11-year-old and his 3D printer
-
AdBlock Plus: The Internet's Ad Gatekeeper?
-
A New Incentive for Cord Cutters
-
The Media Supernova
-
The Future History of the Newspaper Industry
-
The Totally Legal Subpoena
-
A Journalistic Civil War Odyssey
-
Web Only Audio Extra - Crowdsourcing FOIA Requests
-
Web Only Audio Extra - TV Cord Cutters


Comments [2]
I'm sorry to say that this story brought into focus for me a discomfort I've had with our local NPR station, WNPR in Connecticut. During pledge drives, the Faith Middleton Show, an afternoon talk show, turns into an infomercial, touting items during the entire hour of the show that are then offered as promotions in exchange for donations. Doesn't this seem to cross just the journalistic line you are talking about?
Really loved this story and laughed out loud when I heard this line about online media: "the dividing line between editorial and advertising is less firewall than shower curtain."
The story struck a chord with me because I'm taking a digital journalism class and have been thinking about the viability of hard news online. When you start look at successful digital publishers like Gawker, it's obvious that much less attention is paid to ethics and independence than the hard news outlets. I don't think it *has* to be this way, and I think Wikileaks is an early indicator that it won't be this way for much longer, but at the moment, the public still gets hard news from print and television, and goes to the internet to satisfy niche interests.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.