PJ Vogt
PJ Vogt is a producer for On the Media. He's on Twitter here.
I’m not sure how I found it in the first place, but the image that I most often think about when I think about September 11th was shot by a photographer named Melanie Einzig on the morning of the attacks. She didn't publish it for years because she was worried it would offend people.
I wanted to get Melanie on the radio show this week, but we ended up too squeezed for time and it didn’t work out. However, when I spoke to her on the phone she mentioned that the writer Luc Sante had been moved by her photo as well, he'd even asked her for a print. I decided to call him to find out what it is about this picture, exactly.
What drew you to the photo?
One of the things about it is that while it’s not like the Zelig figure exactly, it’s not unrelated to it. You have this historical moment occurring and there’s somebody in a corner of the picture who’s paying no attention whatsover. Looking at his watch as the zeppelin plows into the skyscraper. This postman going about his rounds completely unaware of the conflagration going on a few blocks down and above his head. It’s such an amazing picture – the fact that it exists, that that moment was recorded. It's one for the ages.
When I spoke to Melanie, she said that she waited a few years after the attacks to release the photo, and even then, she published it in a quiet way. She said she was worried the photo could offend people, or that it would be misinterpreted. What do you think she meant?
I can understand her decision not to publish it right away. It would have been attacked as being insufficiently attentive to the enormity of the day. It would have seemed irreverent. When something of that magnitude happens, everything seems to be in service of awe, shock, reverence – reaffirming basic values, casting out demons. Something that includes such a violent contradiction within its depiction of the event – it just feels wrong. People wouldn’t have been able to take it in right away.
Melanie is such a quick visual thinker that her eye is operating as a remote sensor far away from her intellectual brain. But at the time it wouldn’t have made any sense. Everybody was reeling.
Minutes after that picture was taken, you had all those people on Church street with vast clouds of debris pursuing them like a movie monster. Melanie’s photo argues in favor of there being more than one truth. There is a way of seeing this event as occurring in the middle of an ordinary day. At the same time that the twin towers were falling, there were people having toothaches. At the time you couldn’t give that credence – the enormity, the magnitude of the catastrophe seemed to crowd everything but itself out of the picture of life. Here you have evidence of that very simultaneity.
I think that for a lot of people, there’s a kind of agreed upon series of pictures that represent September 11th in their mind’s eye. Can you give me a quick run-down of what those images are?
You see the images of the planes approaching the towers, the towers bursting into flames, the towers toppling, the clouds of debris and the people running, the hordes over the Brooklyn bridge. And then the soot-covered firefighters.
How is it that everyone agrees on a visual narrative so quickly, on pretty much the same set of images?
The thinking is done for us. The media processes these things. We come to recognize those images. On 9/11 itself, I was living in the country. I didn’t see TV until that evening. I went to a pizzeria to pick up a pizza, and just while I was waiting I saw the 5 or 6 images we’re talking about. It was literally the same strips of film being re-run again and again. I saw that series of pictures three dozen times in the time it took for my pizza to come out of the oven.
And that’s how it was for everyone, unless you were actually there, watching from a rooftop or across the river. Then you might’ve seen things that you know were different from what was retold by the media to the rest of the world. But if you were watching on TV or in newspapers – there wasn’t so much on the web back then – chances are you had your range of imagery preselected for you. So it would take quite an exercise of imagination for you to imagine any kind of alternative.
So besides the fact that it's a photo that is memorable and isn't one of those pre-selected images, what’s the value of Melanie’s photo?
The photo's value isn't news value. But we can be certain that it tells us something – it tells us that life went on,life took a minute before it noticed what was happening. It does tell us this.
It also wasn’t a picture for the time. It’s a picture for reflection. The irony it contains (which is not irony ha-ha, it’s a deeper human reflective irony) is something that can only be contemplated at some remove. So I think that future generations will already be familiar with the major stock of images – the 5 or 6 that we talked about. They will have those just built into their mental archives, the way we have the Zapruder film or whatever, but that this is the picture that just puts an additional meditative layer upon all of that.
Comments [17]
Talk about torturing a photo. The guy is a UPS driver. UPS drivers have one mission during the day, they deliver. They are on a schedule, and they are being evaluated as to how well they stick to the expected time it will take to deliver their stuff.
That guy didn't know that what was happening behind him was an historic event, but he did know that he would be judged as to how he took care of his business.
And aren't New Yorker's supposed to be blase' and jaded and immune to what other people consider noteworthy because they see it all every day and being impressed or distracted by what's going on around you shows a lack of sophistication and coolness?
It's just a picture, and the guy is just doing his job. No need to make it a bigger deal than it is. And I'm no New Yorker.
Not relevant, but I was on my way to jury duty that day as well. Added a bit to the surrealism and national focus as it unfolded.
Actually, if we spent less time sticking our nose in the affairs of other countries by minding our own business maybe there wouldn't have been a 9/11.
Can someone please explain Ms Einzig's Zelig reference. A picture of a blimp crashing into a skyscraper, and a guy looking at his watch?
Thanks.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bruegel,_Pieter_de_Oude_-_De_val_van_icarus_-_hi_res.jpg
You might look at it this way. Since a picture
can't show real feelings, then maybe this man
is dedicated worker doing his job.
Had no idea what was going on behind him? Hardly. Representative of how the rest of the country carried on? Pffft! He looks scared and shiny from sweat. It was a dry, crisp morning yes? My take is he was making a quick few last deliveries for the day. The blank look is because in his mind he is three steps ahead plotting his getaway. The split second of a photograph does not a moment make.
To me this photgraph is representative of what people around the country werre doing...going about their day to day trying to comprehend what was happening. It was a surreal situation, and this photo so caputres that. We didn't know we were under attack. We didn't know the towers would come down. We pressed forward as we do, until we could take action or grieve, and some of us are just now understanding the true depth of the sadness that exploded that day.
It reminds me of a scene in the novel La Debacle, by Emile Zola. While a major battle rages, a farmer in the background plows his field.
It's a compelling photograph from a gifted photographer. It is fair to say that Melanie's photo juxtaposes the horror of the 9/11 attacks with the sheer normalcy of a Manhattan UPS delivery man making his rounds. But I don't see him as blase and oblivious to the burning towers. Rather, I see in his eyes and demeanor an urgency coupled with fear. Perhaps he worried that he wouldn't complete his deliveries. Perhaps he worried that his own life was in jeopardy.
Dear Logan,
I know what you mean and good observation. I was using an Olympus Stylus point and shoot camera which I had taken with with me to jury duty that day. The flash went off automatically because the UPS man was in the shade. It creates the effect that he is superimposed on the backdrop but I swear to g-d : no photoshop.
This photo very accurately portrays the moments right after the planes hit. I vividly remember walking towards the subway to go Manhattan from Brooklyn on 9/11 and stopping to stare at the burning towers before heading underground to go to work. Really it just seemed like a crazy emergency fire at the time... you would've never imagined that those buildings could collapse.
Melanie's photos all have 2 sides to them - what you see and what's going on behind the scenes - you're caught in the 1st part of the
photo - what your mind readily recognizes - the 2nd part is the reality of what is really happening before your eyes! She is genius with the camera. She has another one of 9/11 which is also amazing: the normalcy of
life vs the actual event - so hard to equate the 2 of them into reality in 1 photo!
That good UPS man had probably seen and been aware of what was happening long before the others on the sidewalk. His dispatcher no doubt told him to continue untill necessity dictated otherwise. He would have been remiss in his duties had he done otherwise.
The amazing thing to me is that anybody would take offense at this picture. Obviously, the fellow has no clue that anything is transpiring behind him...and why would he? He's not looking that way, and even the people who are looing that way have not yet absorbed what they're seeing.
For me, it captures the moment when life was still normal, before "Remember 9/11" came to dominate the American psyche.
I regret to ask...But is it photoshopped? To my perception, the glint off the UPS man is very different that the glint off others and other objects in the picture. Yet the edge of his shoulders and the sidewalk beneath his feet appear to be within the same light as other objects, again to my perception.
Dear PJ -
That's a UPS man not a post man. Pedantic point maybe but it also seems to be important as it's a very American trait to keep on task which he clearly is.
Leave a Comment
Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.