Eyes in the Sky

Friday, January 13, 2012 - 12:35 PM

On this week's show, U. Nebraska journalism professor Matt Waite admits to having childlike fascination with drones. He recalls being at a conference in San Diego last summer, where a demo video for the Gatewing X100 left him positively giddy.

Matt was poised to buy the Belgian-made drone, until he found out that it cost $65,000 and was "completely illegal" in the US. (The FAA currently prohibits autonomous aircraft like the X100, which runs without remote control.) Though Matt's ended up the conference empty-handed, the experience helped inspire him to launch the Drone Journalism Lab.

Though I share Matt's fascination with drones, part of me also fears the dystopia described by Noel Sharkey and Sarah Knuckey in The Guardian   : "the paranoiac nightmare of our airspace being polluted by police and personal drones with all of us watching our watchers." I guess I could learn to live with this "mutual assured destruction" scenario between The People and The Man. After all, the alternative would probably be one-way surveillance, à la Jeremy Bentham's Panopticon.

If I think about this stuff too much, it scares the heebie-jeebies out of me.

For now, I prefer to just sit back and watch some of the amazing drone journalism footage already out there. If the FAA decides to loosen restrictions, this technology could be the next big thing in American journalism.

Warsaw

At the Polish Independence Day Protests on November 11, 2011, taken with the six-bladed Robokopter.

Moscow

Click here for AirPano's stunning still panoramas of the Russian election protests on December 10, 2011.

Tuscaloosa

Damage in Alabama after a tornado swept through on April 27, 2011.

Giza

The Necropolis.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onWRXXg7QZg&feature=related

More in:

Comments [2]

Terrence Donovan from Georgia

A major concern of the FAA and others is the potential disaster that drones pose to commercial and general aviation flying thither and yon on random routes, uncontrolled by Air Traffic Control. Hence the 400 ft altitude restriction. Although privacy issues related to aerial spying and surveillance are important and significant, a midair collision of an unmanned aerial vehicle with a passenger laden aircraft would be the mother of all privacy violations.

Jan. 15 2012 02:54 PM
Rick Evans from 21703

Ever notice how journalists always fret over the creepiness of surveillance tools in the hands of police but have no problem with the same tools in the hands of Paparazzi? Yes the interviewee did speak of the creepiness of invading the privacy of celebrities. Yet journalists have no problem working for tabloid rags and shows that publish images sold by the same creeps.

Jan. 15 2012 10:36 AM

Leave a Comment

Register for your own account so you can vote on comments, save your favorites, and more. Learn more.
Please stay on topic, be civil, and be brief.
Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. Names are displayed with all comments. We reserve the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the Comment Guidelines before posting. By leaving a comment, you agree to New York Public Radio's Privacy Policy and Terms Of Use.

Supported by

Subscribe to Podcast iTunes RSS

Feeds