(<a href="http://flickr.com/photos/topher76/293277608/" target="_blank">topher</a>/flickr)
(topher/flickr)

Marketplace of Ideas

February 01, 2008

Political futures markets have long been regarded as good forecasters of real outcomes, drawing as they do on the wisdom of crowds. But Dan Gross, senior editor at Newsweek, wouldn’t bet on it. He says they’re not so much forecasting as they are reacting.


Listener Comments Leave a Comment | Refresh Comments
[1]
Posted by: Bill Korner
February 04, 2008 - 08:19PM
Newark, NJ

"Completely Inaccurate!" is not an expression that will win a lot of trust from me. This piece is most interesting when it avoids such generalizations in favor of somewhat more nuanced analysis. But you can't win points for being subtle and then turn around and punchline me with: "Long run... don't bet on them." Either give me some stats on how much more or less often they've been accurate than polls in a particular "long run" or, better yet, tell me why the data is inconclusive on that and under what conditions you would consider it conclusive.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments on On the Media are moderated. On the Media reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the onthemedia.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode