Bradley Effect
(Getty Images)

Paper Backs

October 24, 2008

For the first time in its 161 year history, The Chicago Tribune endorsed the democratic party's nominee for president this week. The Los Angeles Times, after 36 years of endorsing no one, also endorsed Obama. But do such announcements really have an impact? Editor&Publisher editor Greg Mitchell argues that they do.


  • "Outta Space Canoe" Five Style
Listener Comments Leave a Comment | Refresh Comments
[1]
Posted by: chris oconnell
October 28, 2008 - 02:19PM
Silicon Valley

I have a hard time believing endorsements matter, especially newspaper endorsements. Mark Shields talks about how the higher the office, the less endorsements matter. If the newspaper tells me to vote for Joe the Dogcatcher, sure I will do that since I know nothing about him or that race. But president? I have seen these guys for 2 years now so thanks for the advice, newspaper, now I will make my decision.

Greg points to his own methodology in the previous election showing that newpaper endorsements matter, but I would prefer something less anecdotal before I can believe it. (Even though my example with the dogcather was anecdotal as well.)

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments on On the Media are moderated. On the Media reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the onthemedia.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode