eye

Smirch Engine

March 20, 2009

There’s a name for how cruel people can get given a little anonymity on the internet. It’s called “online disinhibition effect” and the resulting venom can ruin your day or worse, destroy your good name. Bob looks at the fraught relationship on the web between reputation, privacy and the law.


  • "Let's Go" Build Buildings
Listener Comments Leave a Comment | Refresh Comments
[1]
Posted by: Byron Miller
March 22, 2009 - 03:58PM
Glen Ellyn, IL

I was listening this afternoon and heard the segment regarding Yelp. It sounded to me like Yelp got a PR placement. The argument that people in San Francisco AND Chicago have made is that when they refused to sign on with YELP, positive reviews disappeared and negative reviews suddenly received top billing. Apparently, there have been sufficient complaints to suggest some truth to this. Your interviewer asked only about negative reviews, not about YELP sales practices. I don't use YELP, but being aware of the controversy, I was disappointed that your interviewer appeared to serve up only soft lobs to the YELP founder.

[2]
Posted by: Vincent Murphy
March 23, 2009 - 05:38PM
Shrewsbury, MA

In this report, On the Media makes a typical mistake by confusing the World Wide Web with the Internet. The latter has been around since the 70s, while the Web gained popularity in the early 90s. So the Internet wasn't in its infancy in 1996.

The "online disinhibition effect" is really just a fancy way of saying that anonymous people can be jerks. Anyone who participated in USENET newsgroups in the 80s and 90s know that it isn't a new thing at all.

[3]
Posted by: Chris Gray
March 26, 2009 - 06:45AM
New Haven, CT

I have only rarely found anything worth reading in an anonymous post and the so-called adults who would deny an interview or employment on the basis of such suspect information really need to rethink their selection criteria.

Hey, USENET, that's probably what the newsgroup Barak used to organize that event in DC I met he and Michelle at was part of! I wasn't following all the subtle distinctions back then.

Leave a Comment

Please keep your comments relevant to this entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments. All comments on On the Media are moderated. On the Media reserves the right to edit any comments posted on this site. Please read the onthemedia.org Comment Guidelines before posting.

Your comment


* required
The information entered into this form will not be used to send unsolicited email and will not be sold to a third party.
 
Back to Episode