The Battle To Control .art

Monday, June 02, 2014 - 01:46 PM

Over the past few months ICANN — The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers — has been rolling out the first of what might eventually be hundreds of new top level domain names. TLDs are the suffixes you type at the end of a  web address: .com, .net, .org, and so on. For years there have been 22 generic TLDs, plus country codes, but now ICANN is planning on adding upwards of 1000 new options.

One of those options is .art, and the contention over who’s going to manage it is actually pretty interesting.

10 groups are vying to be in charge of .art, 8 commercial applicants and 2 community applicants. The community applicants are e-flux, a New York-based arts organization, and Dadotart, a subsidiary of DeviantArt created specifically to manage the .art domain.

Who gets to manage a new domain name can actually matter a lot. As DeviantArt points out, whoever’s in charge will be able to set the prices and terms for using a .art address. A managing agency could choose to put particular restrictions on a domain, or to price out certain users from buying a site within a particular top level domain.  

e-flux and DeviantArt are both supporting each others’ applications, since, according to e-flux:

Both are committed to develop “.ART” as an authentic Internet address for the arts and represent its community.

DeviantArt has framed the decision it believes has to be made in no uncertain terms in a letter to ICANN:

ICANN has a choice: it can promote the arts or destroy their common identity.

The concerns e-flux and DeviantArt have are definitely worth paying attention to. It isn’t hard to imagine .art domains being made so expensive or being so quickly snatched up that individuals or groups who might make the most of them would be denied access. It happens with much dumber domains.

At the same time, .art (along with .music, and a bunch of the other new TLDs) present a new challenge for overseeing the web. The 22 non-country TLDs that existed until this year were either incredibly general (.com, .net), or restricted to certain clearly delineated purposes (.gov, .edu, .biz). In order to win the .art domain as a community applicant, e-flux or DeviantArt might have to provide the same sort of clearly delineated definition for art.

There’s an argument that that sort of definition of the artistic community is exactly what the art world does. But one of the promises of art online (especially on sites like DeviantArt) is that those who want to be a part of the artistic process can, without being told their work isn’t actually art.

It’s possible that there simply isn’t a satisfying solution to this situation, but that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. At the end of the process, even if one of the community applicants win, would a modern Henry Darger be able to get a .art address?

(h/t Metafilter)

Tags:

More in:

Comments [1]

Much of this is based on a misunderstanding of the domain system (TLD-Top Level Domain). Although, this art.icle does sort of get the issue of who and how the rules might be applied, the TLD, .art, will not have any power over "art" or what is considered art. A better example is the .museum TLD which has been around and has a more obvious raison d'etre: http://about.museum/background/ and is based on a reasonable recognition of institutions.

Right now, the TLD .co is being sold as an alternative for .com, despite .co being the country of Columbia and run by their telecommunications system. Or bit.ly which uses the Libyan government controlled registration system. And when I first heard of the .xxx TLD as a good thing by those who wanted to create a virtual red light district, I knew that if it happened-- and it did--that it would be a cash cow by extracting money from universities, celebrities and businesses that did not want to be associated with .xxx.

So I would step back and realize this is not an important issue, as actual art will not be confined or defined by a geek designation (that's geek to me, I think I hear from many artists).

Jun. 02 2014 02:58 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Supported by

 

Embed the TLDR podcast player

TLDR is a short podcast and blog about the internet by PJ Vogt and Alex Goldman. You can subscribe to our podcast here. You can follow our blog here. We’re also on Twitter, and we play Team Fortress 2 more or less constantly, so find us there if you like to communicate via computer games from six years ago.

Subscribe to Podcast iTunes RSS

Feeds