Why It's Silly to Make Rules About What Your Employees Can Say Online

Friday, December 20, 2013 - 11:04 AM

(Shawn Campbell)

In September, after the Navy Yard shooting, a journalism professor at Kansas University posted the following tweet:

The tweet, not totally surprisingly, sparked national outrage among conservatives.

Republican lawmakers in Kansas threatened to slash the university’s budget unless Guth was fired. He was put on paid leave, and afterwards seems to have been sent to some sort of non-teaching limbo. The story seemed mostly over.

Until yesterday, when news broke that Kansas University would institute a new policy dictating what professors can say on social media. The school can fire anyone who breaks the rules. The guidelines start with prohibitions against things like directly inciting violence and disclosing confidential student information, and then quickly broaden out to include speech that:

“— Impairs discipline by superiors or harmony among co-workers, has a detrimental impact on close working relationships, impedes the performance of the speaker’s official duties, interferes with the regular operation of the university, or otherwise adversely affects the university’s ability to efficiently provide services.”

This is bad, but not for the reason you might think. Freedom of speech doesn’t mean that I can say whatever I want and my boss can’t punish me for it. If Kansas University wants to set incredibly severe free speech restrictions for its employees (“impairs harmony among co-workers!”) that’s a fight for the professors and the school to have. But what KU shouldn’t do is make employees’ online speech its own separate category.

From the University’s perspective, Twitter or Facebook posts need their own rules because they have the potential to become massively and suddenly public, the way Guth’s tweet did.

But that’s true of anything that’s said publicly, or even anything said privately that becomes publicly broadcast.

What if Guth had stood in front of his class and expressed the same sentiment, and one of those students had tweeted a quote? Which set of University speech codes would Guth be subject to? What if he said the same words to a reporter, and then people tweeted it out from that reporter’s article?

Our words end up online, whether or not we put them there.

(via Nathan Jurgenson)

Tags:

More in:

Comments [3]

Will Caxton from Montana

Isn't this the sort of thing tenure was created to prevent?

Dec. 26 2013 01:20 PM
Martin Hackworth

Just in case you want to see where this slippery slope leads, check out the plight of Laraine Cook: http://www.pocatelloshops.com/new_blogs/politics/?p=11174 Ms. Cook was fired for posting a photo of herself on Facebook wearing a bathing suit. If you search the name Laraine Cook, you'll find dozens of local news articles about her plight. Though there have been dozens of letters to the editor in the Journal, and a petition in her defense has garnered thousands of signatures, the local school board isn't budging.

Dec. 20 2013 06:01 PM
David J. from Michigan

You know that sounds similar to another story going around social media today. You might want to check Twitter ;)

Dec. 20 2013 12:34 PM

Leave a Comment

Email addresses are required but never displayed.

Supported by

 

Embed the TLDR podcast player

TLDR is a short podcast and blog about the internet by PJ Vogt and Alex Goldman. You can subscribe to our podcast here. You can follow our blog here. We’re also on Twitter, and we play Team Fortress 2 more or less constantly, so find us there if you like to communicate via computer games from six years ago.

Subscribe to Podcast iTunes RSS

Feeds